A consensus
panel
convened by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) today concluded
there is clear evidence that needle acupuncture treatment is effective
for postoperative and chemotherapy nausea and vomiting, nausea of
pregnancy, and postoperative dental pain.
The 12-member panel also concluded in their
consensus statement that
there are a number of other pain-related conditions for which
acupuncture may be effective as an adjunct therapy, an acceptable
alternative, or as part of a comprehensive treatment program. but for
which there is less convincing scientific data. These conditions
include but are not limited to addiction, stroke rehabilitation,
headache, menstrual cramps, tennis elbow, fibromyalgia (general muscle
pain), low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, and asthma.
"We need more high quality research to
validate
what appears to be useful for the millions of Americans that have used
acupuncture in this country. The challenge in studying acupuncture is
to integrate the theory of Chinese medicine into the conventional
Western biomedical research model and into the conventional health care
arena," said panel chairman David J. Ramsay, D.M., D. Phil., president
of the University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Acupuncture is a family of procedures, the
most
well known of which involves penetration of specific anatomic locations
on the skin, called acupuncture points, by thin, solid, generally
metallic needles.
Acupuncture is one of the oldest and most
commonly
used forms of traditional medicine in the world--dating back for at
least 2,500 years. The general theory of acupuncture is based on the
premise that there are patterns of energy flow called Qi (pronounced
"chee") throughout the body that are essential for optimal health.
Public awareness and use of acupuncture
increased
in the United States following President Nixon's visit to China in 1972
and New York Times reporter James Reston's
account of how
physicians in Beijing eased his post-surgery abdominal pain with
needles. According to the World Health Organization, there are
approximately 10,000 acupuncture specialists in the U.S., and an
estimated 3,000 practicing acupuncturists are physicians. In 1993 the
Food and Drug Administration reported that Americans were spending $500
million per year and making approximately 9 to 12 million patient
visits for acupuncture treatments.
The introduction and acceptance of any new
treatment can be a difficult process. When that new treatment is based
on theories unfamiliar to Western medicine, the difficulties are
accentuated. To enhance the acceptance of acupuncture in the U.S., the
panel emphasized the need for improved understanding of perspectives
between acupuncture practitioners and today's conventional health care
community. The panel commended the ongoing increase in improved
training and called for more uniform licensing, certification, and
accreditation of acupuncturists among States, which will help the
public identify qualified acupuncture practitioners and to have more
assurance in quality of service. Thirty-four states license or
otherwise regulate the practice of acupuncture by nonphysicians, and
have established training standards for certification to practice
acupuncture.
Adverse side effects of acupuncture are
extremely
low and often lower than conventional treatments. However, the panel
noted that adverse side effects have occurred on rare occasions. They
recommended that patients be fully informed of their treatment options,
expected prognosis, relative risk, and safety practices to minimize the
risks prior to undergoing acupuncture treatment. Because many
individuals seek health care treatment from both acupuncturists and
physicians, the consensus panel advocated a strengthening of
communications between these health care provider groups to maximize
the possibility that important medical problems are not overlooked. The
panel additionally encouraged broader public access to acupuncture
treatment by urging insurance companies, Federal and state health
insurance programs including Medicare and Medicaid, and other third
party payers to expand their coverage to include appropriate
acupuncture treatments. Doing so, the panel stated, would help remove
the financial barriers to access to these services.
Finally, the panel identified important
areas for
future acupuncture research. In particular, the panel emphasized the
importance of evaluating acupuncture for the treatment of specific
conditions using study designs that can withstand rigorous scientific
scrutiny. "The acceptance of acupuncture as a reliable therapeutic
choice in Western medicine will depend on such rigorous studies," said
Dr. Ramsay.
The panel issued their consensus statement
following an extensive review of the existing medical literature and a
series of presentations by acupuncture research experts at a 3-day NIH
Consensus Development Conference on Acupuncture. The full NIH Consensus
Statement on Acupuncture is available by calling 1-888-NIH-CONSENSUS
(1-888-644-2667) or by visiting the NIH Consensus Development Program
Web site at http://consensus.nih.gov.
The National Institutes of Health Consensus
Development Program was established in 1977 and is the premier health
technology assessment and transfer program in American medicine. Under
this program, the Office of Medical Applications of Research at NIH
organizes major conferences that produce consensus statements and
technology assessment statements on controversial issues in medicine
important to health care providers, patients, and the general public.
This conference was sponsored by the NIH
Office of
Medical Applications of Research and the NIH Office of Alternative
Medicine. The conference was cosponsored by the National Cancer
Institute, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute of
Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the National Institute
of Dental Research, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the NIH
Office of Research on Women's Health.
|